Source A Ernest Renan, ‘What is a Nation? In a lecture delivered

cbse10

#1

Source A Ernest Renan, ‘What is a Nation? In a lecture delivered at the University of Sorbonne in 1882, the French philosopher Ernest Renan (1823-92) outlined his understanding of what makes a nation. The lecture was subsequently published as a famous essay entitled ‘Qu’est-ce qu’une nation?’ (‘What is a Nation?’).
In this essay Renan criticises the notion suggested by others that a nation is formed by a common language, race, religion, or territory: A nation is the culmination of a long past of endeavours, sacrifice and devotion. A heroic past, great men, glory, that is the social capital upon which one bases a national idea. To have common glories in the past, to have a common will in the present, to . have performed great deeds together, to wish to perform still more, these are the essential conditions of being a people.
A nation is therefore a large-scale solidarity … Its existence is a daily plebiscite … A province is its inhabitants; if anyone has the right to be consulted, it is the inhabitant. A nation never has any real interest in annexing or holding on to a country against its will.
The existence of nations is a good thing, a necessity even. Their existence is a guarantee of liberty, which would be lost if the world had only one law and only one master.
Summarise the attributes of a nation, as Renan understands them. Why, in his view, are nations important?


#2

The French philosopher Ernest Renan explained his
understanding of what made a nation. According to him a nation is not formed by a common language, race and religion.
To form a nation endeavour, sacrifice, devotion are very necessary. A nation is a large-scale solidarity. Inhabitants of a nation have the right to be consulted.
The existence of nation is not only a good thing but also a necessity. A nation has never any real interest in annexing or holding on to a country against its will.
The nations are important as
(i) Existence of the nation is a guarantee of liberty.
(ii) Liberty would be lost if the world had only one law and only one master.