The following newspaper report was published on 23rd March, 2010.
"Beverage giant Coca Cola must pay $47 million for the environmental damage caused at a bottling plant in the Southern Indian state of Kerala.
A committee in Kerala examining the practices of Coca-Cola found the company caused severe damage to farms and the local environment by dumping polluted waste water sludge on area crops from 1999 through 2004. The environmental report found high levels of cadmium in the sludge, caused declining crop yields, forcing substantial migration and steep unemployment in the area. Coca Cola disputes the findings pending a court ruling."
Do you think the company was correct in disputing the findings? If not, what should they have done? Give your reasons.